Author |
Message |
|
Rosetta runs fine with no gpu grid. 100% cpu usage. As soon as the two nvidia cards kick in at .51% cpu usage each, my window task manager reports cpu usage at 75-80%. also rosetta only runs 3 tasks. Any ideas? I dont think I set swan sync on this computer as its xp 64 and i dont see it in variables. Would love to have a more stable cpu usage in windows task manager. thanks |
|
|
skgivenVolunteer moderator Volunteer tester
![Avatar](https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/77be8b04dc35f6033048abca3f3803c4?s=100&d=identicon) Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level
![Histidine - More than 1.5B credits His](img/badges/aa/badge_his.png) Scientific publications
![Top 100% (2761st/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_white.png) ![Top 75% (1680th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 10% (266th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (15th/4410) contribution to Buch et al, PNAS 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/2450) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (15th/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (27th/3113) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (352nd/1995) contribution to Venken et al, JCTC 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (15th/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (49th/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (62nd/4477) contribution to Pérez-Hernández et al, JCP 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (70th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (14th/1283) contribution to Doerr et al. JCTC 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (45th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (18th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (27th/3611) contribution to Ferruz et al., JCIM 2015 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (34th/4128) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (49th/4815) contribution to Stanley et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (105th/4730) contribution to Noe et al., Nat Chem 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 100% (1222nd/1348) contribution to Doerr et al, JCTC 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_white.png) ![Top 1% (35th/4634) contribution to Martinez-Rosell et al, JCIM 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 50% (485th/1656) contribution to Kapoor et al., Sci Rep 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 10% (50th/1885) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 75% (551st/1022) contribution to Wang et al., ACS Cent. Sci. 2019 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 25% (307th/1541) contribution to Rodriguez-Espigares et al., Nat Meth 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 10% (29th/1450) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, Sci Rep 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (334th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) |
Welcome to the forum.
The task results do show that you are not using swan_sync.
I suggest you reduce the number of CPU's 'configured' to be used in Boinc Manager - try 3, and if that's not enough drop to 2 CPU cores. You can do this by setting the 'on multiprocessor systems use at most' value to 75%.
All GPU projects use some CPU processing power, some more than others. Obviously using two GPU's requires more CPU time than one. One CPU core might be enough to cover both GPU's sufficiently. The CPU usage is still likely to fluctuate between 80% and 100%, so it's not like you are loosing a full CPU core. You are just optimizing for better GPU performance. To some extent the GPU tasks you are running make a difference to CPU utilization, so expect variation.
____________
FAQ's
HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help |
|
|
|
I've just switched over to Rosetta and I've noticed that it is a very demanding project for my CPU. I usually run Bionic 24/7 on my personal computer, but Rosetta is the first project I've attached to that seems to eat up every spare Cpu cycle and cause stutter and system lag when the settings are left at 100%. it also uses substantially more ram and HDD space, but its a great program and I'm determined to contribute, even at my snail-slow pace of 700ppd.
my guess is that GPU grid is "reserving" some processor space because it needs a processor to feed the GPUs but it isn't crunching like Rosetta is. the processor is merely preparing instructions for the GPUs which goes in bursts, but because Gpu grid is allocating .5 Cpu cores per instance(1 total) you aren't seeing 1 whole core crunching.
but GPU grid is doing the same type of research at something like 100 times faster than a CPU could do the same thing. Gpus are just that much faster. I think its a fair trade off, honestly. I'm almost positive that windows 7 did something to address this because of the way my cpu is being utilized, but i doubt there is really a setting available that would address this particular issue. you can get a copy of win 7, or wait 2 years and get one of those new maxwell cards when they come out.
I suggest that you always keep in mind that you are a volunteer though and that volunteering 700ppd is more than 99% of people do. the 1% who build dedicated server farms and such are a great help, of course, but really gpu grid and the rest of the bionic platform relies on us doing what we can with our 'spare' cycles. so if your program is running at 75% that is really great. there is no reason to lament the loss of that other 25%(which as I explained is producing 10x the work), just contribute and think "100% is too much" ^_)^
0.02 |
|
|
TheFiendSend message
Joined: 26 Aug 11 Posts: 100 Credit: 2,640,259,186 RAC: 1,718,855 Level
![Phenylalanine - More than 2B credits Phe](img/badges/aa/badge_phe.png) Scientific publications
![Top 25% (1998th/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 50% (818th/3113) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 90% (4870th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 25% (394th/1995) contribution to Venken et al, JCTC 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 10% (246th/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 75% (2368th/4477) contribution to Pérez-Hernández et al, JCP 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 1% (18th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (16th/1283) contribution to Doerr et al. JCTC 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (17th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (43rd/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (21st/3611) contribution to Ferruz et al., JCIM 2015 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/4128) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (31st/4815) contribution to Stanley et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (126th/4730) contribution to Noe et al., Nat Chem 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 50% (400th/1348) contribution to Doerr et al, JCTC 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 10% (60th/4634) contribution to Martinez-Rosell et al, JCIM 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (141st/1656) contribution to Kapoor et al., Sci Rep 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (130th/1885) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 75% (402nd/672) contribution to Martinez-Rosell et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 10% (33rd/1541) contribution to Rodriguez-Espigares et al., Nat Meth 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (124th/1450) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, Sci Rep 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (52nd/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) |
I can recommend Docking@home as a less resource hungry project compared to Rosetta. I run Docking and GPUGRID together on a 6 Core AMD Phenom II running 100% with a GTX460 using 0.39 CPU and they work together without slowing down normal performance on everyday tasks.
Docking work units have a much lower memory usage compared to Rosseta ones.
I found that if I ran Rosseta instead of Docking much the higher memory usage started slowing down my systems significantly, and CPU usage dropped significantly.
GPUGRID, Docking and Rosseta are all Biological based projects, so both Docking and Rosseta are complimentary to GPU Grid.
Running Docking my Hex-cores can easily average over 7.5K per day. |
|
|
skgivenVolunteer moderator Volunteer tester
![Avatar](https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/77be8b04dc35f6033048abca3f3803c4?s=100&d=identicon) Send message
Joined: 23 Apr 09 Posts: 3968 Credit: 1,995,359,260 RAC: 0 Level
![Histidine - More than 1.5B credits His](img/badges/aa/badge_his.png) Scientific publications
![Top 100% (2761st/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_white.png) ![Top 75% (1680th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 10% (266th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (15th/4410) contribution to Buch et al, PNAS 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/2450) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (15th/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (27th/3113) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (352nd/1995) contribution to Venken et al, JCTC 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (15th/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (49th/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (62nd/4477) contribution to Pérez-Hernández et al, JCP 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (70th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (14th/1283) contribution to Doerr et al. JCTC 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (45th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (18th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (27th/3611) contribution to Ferruz et al., JCIM 2015 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (34th/4128) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (49th/4815) contribution to Stanley et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (105th/4730) contribution to Noe et al., Nat Chem 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 100% (1222nd/1348) contribution to Doerr et al, JCTC 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_white.png) ![Top 1% (35th/4634) contribution to Martinez-Rosell et al, JCIM 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 50% (485th/1656) contribution to Kapoor et al., Sci Rep 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 10% (50th/1885) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 75% (551st/1022) contribution to Wang et al., ACS Cent. Sci. 2019 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 25% (307th/1541) contribution to Rodriguez-Espigares et al., Nat Meth 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 10% (29th/1450) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, Sci Rep 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (334th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) |
Different projects tax the system in different ways, so it's important to find a good balance. I would specifically look at power usage, especially in the summer; I have seen a difference of >30W power consumption on an i7-920 running different CPU projects. The more power used the higher the CPU temps, the higher the ambient temps and the more heating issues you have with other components.
____________
FAQ's
HOW TO:
- Opt out of Beta Tests
- Ask for Help |
|
|
mikeySend message
Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 298 Credit: 6,829,800,090 RAC: 2,662,447 Level
![Tyrosine - More than 5B credits Tyr](img/badges/aa/badge_tyr.png) Scientific publications
![Top 75% (2009th/3113) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput, 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 90% (4852nd/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 75% (1376th/1995) contribution to Venken et al, JCTC 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 25% (639th/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 50% (1884th/4477) contribution to Pérez-Hernández et al, JCP 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 90% (1732nd/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 75% (2397th/3611) contribution to Ferruz et al., JCIM 2015 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 10% (205th/4128) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 50% (1357th/4815) contribution to Stanley et al., Sci Rep 2016 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 25% (1153rd/4730) contribution to Noe et al., Nat Chem 2017 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 10% (191st/4634) contribution to Martinez-Rosell et al, JCIM 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 50% (599th/1885) contribution to Ferruz et al., Sci Rep 2018 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 100% (611th/672) contribution to Martinez-Rosell et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_white.png) ![Top 10% (138th/1541) contribution to Rodriguez-Espigares et al., Nat Meth 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (56th/1450) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, Sci Rep 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 10% (242nd/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) |
Rosetta runs fine with no gpu grid. 100% cpu usage. As soon as the two nvidia cards kick in at .51% cpu usage each, my window task manager reports cpu usage at 75-80%. also rosetta only runs 3 tasks. Any ideas? I dont think I set swan sync on this computer as its xp 64 and i dont see it in variables. Would love to have a more stable cpu usage in windows task manager. thanks
One of your pc's seems to have 12gb of ram while the other only 4gb of ram, this could be the problem. Your low ram overhead could be causing your problems. |
|
|